Supreme Court: Must Give Due Importance To Natural Wealth: Sc

Di: Ava

In 2021, the Supreme Court issued 865 judgments. In a series of posts, we review the most important judgments organised around eight Gratuity payment: Supreme Court said employers can forfeit gratuity payments if the employee was dismissed due to moral turpitude reason and it was proved in the company’s own disciplinary committee hearing. Earlier based on a 2018 judgement precedent this dismissal for moral turpitude reason had to Explore Article 143 of the Constitution of India, detailing Supreme Court’s advisory jurisdiction. Learn about the recent concerns raised by President Droupadi Murmu regarding the Supreme Court’s directive in State of T.N. v. Governor of T.N.

Govt can’t take over all private properties for ‚common good‘: SC

Wealth Management: Layout, Importance, Procedure & Advantages

The Supreme Court and the High Courts have emphasised that the appellate authorities must give reasons and there should be some discussion of the evidence on record. The President can seek advice from the Supreme Court of India under Article 143 of the Indian Constitution. It allows President to take advice from the Supreme Court on any question of law or fact of public importance. Furthermore, there are concerns regarding the potential influence on the overall reservation quota. What are the main elements of the subcategorization ruling from the Supreme Court? The need for substantive equality is the foundation for the Supreme Court’s decision to permit subcategorization within Scheduled Castes.

Supreme Court: The bench of Indira Banerjee* and JK Maheshwari, JJ has explained that to be ‘substantial’, a question of law must be debatable, not previously settled by law of the land or a binding precedent, and must have a material bearing on the decision of the case, if answered either way, insofar as the rights of the Understand the Supreme Court’s landmark decision on sub-categorising Scheduled Castes (SCs) for reservation benefits.

Not every resource owned by a person can be considered a “material resource of community” to be used for “common good”, the Supreme Court ruled on Tuesday. The judgment, therefore, ensures that policies aimed at wealth distribution must be Wife filed false cases of domestic violence, miscarriage and cruelty to force husband to agree for divorce; Supreme Court gives relief SC junks CBIC plea, says GST errors can be corrected even after deadline The Supreme Court further emphasised that denying ITC due to human errors results in unfair double taxation, where businesses end up paying tax twice

States Transfer Policy Must Give Consideration to Importance of Protecting Employees’ Family Life Case: SK Naushad Rahman and others vs Union of India Coram: Justice DY Chandrachud and Justice Vikram Nath Case No.: Civil Appeal No. 1243 of 2022 Court Observation: “Women are subject to a patriarchal mindset that regards them as primary

Our forests are important sources of natural wealth, covering one-fifth of country’s land area. They supply the timber for the railways, buildings and furniture making.

Exp) Option a is the correct answer. Statement 1 is correct: Under Article 143 of the constitution President can seek opinion of judiciary on any question of law or fact of public importance which has arisen, or which is likely to arise and on any dispute arising out of any preconstitution treaty, agreement, covenant, engagement, Continue reading Consider the

Key Supreme Court Judgments 2021

Advisory Jurisdiction Of Supreme Court
A guide to bringing a case to The Supreme Court
The Collector vs K. Krishnaveni on 3 September, 2019
Key Supreme Court Judgments 2021

The verdict holds importance as several opposition-ruled states such as Kerala, Punjab, Telangana and West Bengal have approached the apex court against delay in giving assent by governors to bills passed by the respective state assemblies. New Delhi: For the first time, the Supreme Court of India While adjudicating upon a land acquisition case, the Supreme Court has observed that when the public interest is clearly articulated and is an urgent and pressing exigency, private interests must give away. The rules of court must always be interpreted in a way that gives effect to the scales of justice that they are designed to balance. It is therefore unnecessary, if not undesirable, to read into both r 39 (2) and r 43 (4) conditions tending

The Supreme Court has asserted in a judgment that forests in India are a national asset and a major contributor to the nation’s financial wealth. Forests are not IN A landmark ruling that has implications on the citizen’s right to hold property, a nine-judge bench of the Supreme Court Tuesday ruled that not all private property can be deemed “material resource of the community” for redistribution Photo by Carmela Reyes-Estrope The Supreme Court has ruled that dam water is an appropriated water already removed from natural resources, and thus, can no longer be subject to national wealth tax.

In In re Gault, 387 U.S. 1 (1967), the U.S. Supreme Court held that juveniles facing delinquency prosecutions must be afforded the due process protected by the Fourteenth Amendment. The case is viewed as turning point in the constitutional rights of juveniles. In India, the principles of natural justice are firmly grounded in Article 14 & 21 of the Constitution. With the introduction of concept of substantive and procedural due process in Article 21, all that fairness which is included in the principles of natural justice can be read into Art. 21. Revenue has to give due regard to the orders of the higher appellate authorities which are binding on them Utmost regard should be paid by the adjudicating authorities and the appellate authorities to the requirements of judicial discipline and the need for giving effect to the orders of the higher appellate authorities which are binding on them as held by the Hon,ble

ஜஸ்ட் டையல்
Our forests are important sources of natural wealth, covering
Govt can’t take over all private properties for ‚common good‘: SC
Dam water not subject to wealth tax, SC rules

The Supreme Court ruled that a divorced wife cannot seek permanent alimony to equalise wealth with her ex-husband, emphasising that maintenance is intended to ensure a standard of living. Explanation: Article 143 of the Constitution empowers the President to seek the opinion of the Supreme Court in two specific categories of matters: i) On any question of law or fact that is of public importance and has either arisen or is likely to arise in the future. ii) On any dispute related to pre-constitution Continue reading With reference to the Advisory Fundamental Duties are duties that citizens owe to the State. They cannot be enforced in a court of law. We track the SC’s decisions over the years on Fundamental Duties.

The Supreme Court observed that the Public Trust Doctrine is part of the law of land.The State also has to act as a trustee for the benefit of the general public in relation to the natural A guide to bringing a case to The Supreme Court 1.1 This page sets out some information to help you decide whether The Supreme Court can help you. The Supreme Court is an appeal court1. This means that it only deals with appeals from The SC reaffirmed the principle of natural justice, foreground, the right to be heard and reasoned decisions as basal to fair proceedings.

The Supreme Court has ruled that dam water is appropriated water and already removed from a natural resource, which means it is no longer the subject of national wealth tax.

The Court also observed that when the Final Survey Report stated that the claim was admissible, the insurance company failed to give cogent reasons for rejecting the surveyor’s report. Amid the rising debate over astronomical alimony demands in divorce cases and misuse of domestic violence laws, the Supreme Court on Thursday said that a divorced wife can’t demand permanent alimony just to maintain equal wealth status with the ex-husband. The apex court expressed dissatisfaction with the rising tendency to demand alimony as an “equalisation In N.D. Jayal vs. Union of India, the Supreme Court reiterated that sustainable development which relates to environmental protection is inherent in right to life under Article 21 of the Constitution and therefore, it should be given due importance as a fundamental right in the process of industrial and economic development of the country.

QQCWB

GV