QQCWB

GV

J-Xy/J-35 Carrier-Borne Fighter Thread

Di: Ava

That’s from a zhuhai airshow years back, for FC-31 for export. Incidentally, for J-XY/35 it will be very similar, but those images are not depicting the weapons loadout for that Has this been shared? A satellite image of the carrier aviation training base. With F-35A/B/C, the canopy opens forward to make space for the lift fan in the F-35B STOVL variant, but that this creates issues for the ejection seat. IE. they need explosives

Sembo 202255 J-35 carrier-based fighter-Afobrick

By the way, besides all these speculations about a dedicated export, a twin-seater and/or a PLAAF version, are there any news about the J-35? Was a third prototype Don’t think the single engine version of j20 will be developed for aircraft carrier usage. First of all, that design was discontinued years before j20 was finalized. Also, single Borrow the landlord post to say 3 points. 1, the next generation of carrier aircraft and fighter 20 are the same generation of fighters (do not think of the fighter than the 20 weak,

It is pretty much the same dimension as confirmed by stats of PL-15E from Zhuhai Airshow. But with a wider wingspan of course. According to this. China will announce naval 5th generation fighter in the coming year. „Moreover, Sun Cong, chief designer of the FC-31 (aka J-31), deployed on carriers—an F

J-35 carrier fighter thread

A twin seat J-XY could certainly fulfill the same kind of battle management/control role that we expect J-20S to do, but let’s remember that J-20 is a much larger airframe than J But a crewed and operational carrier will have vast quantities of fuel, munitions and other flammables on board, that generally do not react well to penetration and I’d also add that SAC in general will also produce a lot more in future beyond only J-XY/35 and variants. I suspect high performance UAVs and UCAVs will be a big part of both

Whichever aircraft is ultimately selected, hopefully China’s carrier-borne fighter mix over the next 15 years will be weighed heavily towards the fifth generation. As the carrier

Actually, instead of carrier-based J-20, what yikecat meant is that there will be a navalized version of J-20. Interesting; so the J-20 vs FC-31 competition for the carrier-based

Other than carrier-based fighter, what about carrier-based UAVs? Combat UAVs such as the X-47B/C and non-combat UAVs such as the MQ-25, for instance. Chengdu is the The reasons FC-31 fans deny J-20 for the carrier-borne fighter aircraft competition are: J-20 is difficult to take off and land in an aircraft carrier with canards. J-20 is

China’s New Fighters Emerge

The J-35, as a naval strike aircraft, is also better served with a twin engine solution since this might enable the airplane to return back to the carrier battle group in case of

The claim by him is that the land-based J-35(A?) has wings that are closer towards the rear of the aircraft, while the carrier-based J-35(B?) has wings that are closer to

Newer materials, production methods, design etc. Like, older 4th gen fighters (and even a lot of newer 4.5th gen upgrades and the likes) use older methods for airframe What’s the reason for the „F-35B sized hump“ behind the cockpit since it can compromise rear visibility. According to the paper apparently they found that enlarging the I agree that J-XY is too small and conservative to serve as the sole combat aircraft for the future PLAN carrier air wing over the next generation. There is little doubt that

Details of the J-20 “Powerful Dragon” are sparse, but it is a twin-engined, 35-ton fighter that is 67 feet long and a wingspan of 42 feet, as well as Mach 2 speed and an From the same artist who first posted drawings of the J-20 + WS-10X and J-10 with TVC engine. This shows a possible canard-configuration fighter with tailhook (possible But prototype J-20s also had a large pitot tube on the nose radome. The J-XY/35 here are early prototypes, and it is normal for prototypes to have pitot tubes in that location.

China’s future carrier-borne stealth fighter J-35 images emerge New images of one of the J-35 prototypes have appeared on Chinese social networks, evidence that the My read is canards will remain a Yang Wei-specific feature, or from the chief designer tree of Song (like the coach tree in pro sports). They are not a feature to compensate

I have a feeling that J-31 will look more like FC-31 v2.0 than J-35. I would personally prefer it look like J35 minus the folding wing and different landing gear rather than

J-XY/J-35 carrier-borne fighter thread

Last week, photos emerged of two new fighters from China’s burgeoning aerospace industry: the twin-seat variant of the Chengdu J-20, and, potentially, the carrier

So if J-XY/35 has (had) a large pitot on the nose cone for the purposes of flight testing and prototyping, then removal of it likely means.? There’s some background for you,

How is everyone doing? I have a basic question. Since FC-31/J-35 does not have side weapon bays, does it mean it will not carry short range AAM such as PL-10? Or it needs

Has this been shared? A satellite image of the carrier aviation training base. interesting j-35 is already being tested for actual carrier operations? i wonder how long until Why it doesn’t have all moving tailsmh I believe you are asking „all moving vertical stabilizer“ because FC-31’s horizontal stabilizer is all moving. My guess is that to

WS-13 (if my memory serves me right) that are currently powering the J-35 prototypes were only meant for stopgap measure, just like how WS-10 being a stopgap

Any guess about the possible anti-surface warfare and SEAD capability of the upcoming carrier borne fighter ? It is said that the front opening canopy allow lift the ejection seat w/o removing the canopy, which is good for carrier maintenance ops. I think it’s also possible to remove the