QQCWB

GV

2014 Triennial Surveillance Review

Di: Ava

2014 Triennial Surveillance Review – External Study – Integrating Bilateral and Multilateral Surveillance on a Continuing Basis 2011 Triennial Surveillance Review – External Commentary – A Short Note on Surveillance and How Reforms in Surveillance Can Help the IMF to Promote Global Financial INTRODUCTION Objectives and Context. The overarching objective of the Triennial Surveillance Review (TSR) is to strengthen the effectiveness and traction of Fund surveillance, which is key

2014 Triennial Surveillance Review - Stakeholders Perspectives on IMF ...

Formally, the note here is an input to the IMF’s 2014 Triennial Surveillance Review. The idea is that by looking at a few key issues the Fund has faced recently, one will gain insights into how Formally, the note here is an input to the IMF’s 2014 Triennial Surveillance Review. The idea is that by looking at a few key issues the Fund has faced recently, one will gain insights into how 2014 TRIENNIAL SURVEILLANCE REVIEW—EXTERNAL COMMENTARY—COMMUNICATIONS Prepared By Martin Wolf1 1. The purpose of

2014 Triennial Surveillance Review : External Study

Country authorities (CAs) in emerging markets (EMs) and low-income countries (LICs) are the most positive about developments. Advice on country-specific policy issues is seen as the INTRODUCTION Overall, the External Advisory Group (EAG) considers the 2014 Triennial Surveillance Review (TSR) to be a comprehensive and balanced account of the state of, and

With the 2011 TSR laying out a wide ranging agenda for surveillance reform, the 2014 review will take a more narrowly focused approach and be mindful of the need to make

It also highlighted serious failings in surveillance of risks to stability. Acknowledging its share of responsibility, the International Monetary Fund has been upgrading its surveillance efforts over

The 2014 review of surveillance comes at a critical juncture for the Fund and its member countries. Policymakers are navigating a brittle, uneven recovery that is still marred by the

INTRODUCTION Objectives and Context. The overarching objective of the Triennial Surveillance Review (TSR) is to strengthen the effectiveness and traction of Fund surveillance, which is key

2014 TRIENNIAL SURVEILLANCE REVIEW

Introduction 1. Overall, the External Advisory Group (EAG) considers the 2014 Triennial Surveillance Review (TSR) to be a comprehensive and balanced account of the state

SciELO - Brasil - The global financial crisis and its effects on the ...

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The 2014 Triennial Surveillance Review takes place at a pivotal time. The crisis may have abated, but the complexity of policymaking has not. Countries are Reflecting the shift in priorities arising from the 2011 Triennial Surveillance Review (TSR), stakeholders welcome the Fund’s work on financial vulnerabilities and risk assessments, and This review seeks to provide a fuller understanding of concerns that the IMF has not been even-handed in its surveillance,

2014 TRIENNIAL SURVEILLANCE REVIEW—EXTERNAL STUDY—MULTILATERAL SURVEILLANCE: ENSURING A FOCUS ON KEY RISKS TO GLOBAL STABILITY Prepared With the 2011 TSR laying out a wide ranging agenda for surveillance reform, the 2014 review will take a more narrowly focused approach and be mindful of the need to make cost-neutral

The composition of this minority is largely invariant to region or income group. 2014 TSR—STAKEHOLDERS’ PERSPECTIVES ON IMF SURVEILLANCE INTERNATIONAL This Triennial Surveillance Review, the second since the height of the crisis in 2009, therefore provides a vital moment to capture lessons that have become clearer over the past three years INTRODUCTION Overall, the External Advisory Group (EAG) considers the 2014 Triennial Surveillance Review (TSR) to be a comprehensive and balanced account of the state of, and

2014 TRIENNIAL SURVEILLANCE REVIEW—EXTERNAL STUDY—REPORT ON INTERVIEWS Prepared By Jack Boorman and Teresa Ter-Minassian1,2 2014 TRIENNIAL SURVEILLANCE REVIEW—EXTERNAL STUDY—MULTILATERAL SURVEILLANCE: ENSURING A FOCUS ON KEY RISKS TO GLOBAL STABILITY Prepared EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The 2014 Triennial Surveillance Review takes place at a pivotal time. The crisis may have abated, but the complexity of policymaking has not. Countries are

With the 2011 TSR laying out a wide ranging agenda for surveillance reform, the 2014 review will take a more narrowly focused approach and be mindful of the need to make cost-neutral As part of the 2014 Triennial Surveillance Review, IMF staff reviewed a range of recent IMF surveillance products to assess how well the Fund is implementing the priorities identified in 2014 TRIENNIAL SURVEILLANCE REVIEW—EXTERNAL STUDY—STRUCTURAL POLICIES IN FUND SURVEILLANCE Prepared By Paul Acquah, Alan Ahearne and Paul Collier1,2

INTRODUCTION Objectives and Context. The overarching objective of the Triennial Surveillance Review (TSR) is to strengthen the effectiveness and traction of Fund surveillance, which is key The 2014 review of surveillance comes at a critical juncture for the Fund and its member countries. Policymakers are navigating a brittle, uneven recovery that is still marred by 2014 TRIENNIAL SURVEILLANCE REVIEW—EXTERNAL STUDY—MULTILATERAL SURVEILLANCE: ENSURING A FOCUS ON KEY RISKS TO GLOBAL STABILITY Prepared

Applying this conceptual framework, the differences in surveillance across countries identified in this review can be grouped into three categories: Differences in the approach—or “inputs”—to

2. Formally, the note here is an input to the IMF’s 2014 Triennial Surveillance Review. The idea is that by looking at a few key issues the Fund has faced recently, one will gain insights into how This Triennial Surveillance Review, the second since the height of the crisis in 2009, therefore provides a vital moment to capture lessons that have become clearer over the past three years

2014 TRIENNIAL SURVEILLANCE REVIEW—EXTERNAL STUDY—EVENHANDEDNESS OF FUND SURVEILLANCE Prepared By Mike Callaghan1 As part of the 2014 Triennial Surveillance Review, IMF staff reviewed a range of recent IMF surveillance products to assess how well the Fund is implementing the priorities